
One stop solution for magnetic products
If one magnet does not provide enough pull force, will stacking two magnets together make them twice as strong?
The short answer is:
Stacking magnets usually increases the overall magnetic performance, but the pull force does not increase in direct proportion to the number of magnets.
For relatively thin magnets, increasing thickness can significantly improve pull force. However, as more magnets are added, the benefit of each additional magnet becomes smaller.
This is known as diminishing returns.
Take two axially magnetized disc magnets with the same size, grade, and magnetization direction.
If they are stacked with the correct N/S pole orientation, they can behave approximately like one thicker magnet.
For example:
1 magnet: D20 × 5 mm
2 stacked magnets: approximately D20 × 10 mm
3 stacked magnets: approximately D20 × 15 mm
Increasing the magnet length in the magnetization direction usually strengthens the external magnetic field and improves pull force.
However, this does not mean:
2 magnets = 2× the pull force
or
3 magnets = 3× the pull force
The key reason is that each additional magnet is farther away from the working surface.
The first magnet is closest to the steel plate and contributes the most to the pull force.
Adding a second magnet can produce a noticeable improvement.
But when a third or fourth magnet is added, those magnets are farther from the steel surface, so their contribution becomes progressively smaller.
Data published by K&J Magnetics for disc magnets of the same diameter shows this clearly:
When a thin magnet becomes thicker, the increase in pull force can be significant.
But once the magnet is already relatively thick, adding more magnetic material may produce only a small improvement.
So:
More stacked magnets do not always mean proportionally more strength.
When discussing whether a magnet is "stronger," it is important to distinguish between two different concepts.
This is usually measured in Gauss or Tesla and describes the magnetic flux density at a specific point near the magnet.
This refers to the force required to separate a magnet from a steel surface.
Pull force is also affected by:
magnet size
contact area
steel thickness
steel grade
surface condition
working air gap
Therefore, a higher Gauss reading does not necessarily mean the pull force will increase by the same percentage.
Stacking is usually more effective when the original magnet is relatively thin.
For example:
D20 × 2 mm
increased to
D20 × 4 mm
may produce a noticeable improvement.
But if the magnet is already:
D20 × 20 mm
increasing it to:
D20 × 40 mm
may provide only a limited gain.
A useful engineering rule of thumb is:
As the magnet length in the magnetization direction approaches its lateral dimension, further increases in thickness tend to produce stronger diminishing returns.
This is not a strict design rule, but it can be useful during early-stage magnet selection.
If the current magnet does not provide enough force, there are several possible solutions.
This is suitable for:
prototype testing
product development
small-volume projects
quick performance verification
The main advantage is flexibility. You can test the effect of greater magnetic thickness without immediately changing the magnet specification.
If testing confirms that greater thickness is needed, you may consider replacing:
2 × D20 × 5 mm
with:
1 × D20 × 10 mm
A one-piece magnet can reduce assembly steps, tolerance stack-up, and the risk of magnets colliding during installation.
If the magnet is already relatively thick, continuing to increase thickness may not be efficient.
In this case, increasing the:
diameter, width, or effective pole area
may sometimes provide a better result.
Not always.
For example, if an N35 magnet does not provide enough pull force, possible solutions include:
increasing thickness
increasing diameter
changing to N42, N48, or N52
optimizing the steel component or magnetic circuit
Which option works best depends on the actual design.
If the magnetic circuit is already limited by steel saturation, air gap, or contact area, simply changing to a higher magnet grade may not produce the expected improvement.
For engineering selection, it is better to evaluate:
size + grade + magnetic circuit + working air gap
rather than focusing only on the magnet grade.
The pull force listed by a magnet supplier is usually measured under relatively ideal test conditions.
In a real application, pull force can be reduced by:
paint
coatings
plastic layers
adhesive
air gaps
uneven surfaces
If the steel plate is too thin, it may also limit magnetic flux and reduce the benefit of stacking more magnets.
For critical industrial applications, a better approach is:
magnetic circuit evaluation + sample testing + safety factor
Usually, yes.
When stacked with the correct pole orientation, two magnets can behave approximately like one thicker magnet.
However, the pull force usually does not double.
Usually not.
As more magnets are added, the contribution of each additional magnet becomes smaller.
In a simple magnetic circuit, their performance may be similar.
However, actual results can be affected by coating layers, assembly gaps, accumulated tolerances, and fixing methods.
Possible reasons include:
the original magnet is already relatively thick
the steel plate is too thin
there is a large air gap
the steel is close to magnetic saturation
the pole orientation is incorrect
the overall magnetic circuit is limiting performance
Stacking magnets usually increases magnetic performance, but the improvement is not unlimited.
For thin magnets, increasing thickness can be very effective. But as the magnet becomes thicker, each additional magnet usually provides a smaller improvement.
Therefore, if your current magnet does not provide enough pull force, do not only consider adding another magnet.
You should also evaluate:
magnet thickness, diameter, grade, working air gap, and magnetic circuit design.
For prototype testing and early product development, stacking magnets is a simple and useful way to verify performance.
For long-term mass production, however, redesigning the application around a properly sized one-piece custom magnet may offer better results in terms of cost, assembly, and consistency.
Search
Categories List
Please give us a message

Beijing Saint Langma Magnetic Industry Technology Co., Ltd.
